The agent records the evidence behind an eligibility, selection, or medical clearance decision, along with the rule version in force at the time.
Solutions · Sport
Replaces · Vendor-locked analytics · Siloed scouting databases
Verifiable AI for sport.
Performance data with unbreakable provenance.
Athletic performance and scouting data is typically locked inside vendor analytics and siloed databases. nOS gives federations and clubs performance analytics, scouting reasoning, and contract intelligence with durable provenance, owned by the organization and portable across seasons. Trace Labs works with bodies such as European Gymnastics and athletic federations to make sport data trustworthy and reusable.
Decision traces enshrinedAthlete performance analytics Scouting and recruitment reasoning Contract and clearance decisions Anti-doping and integrity records
What gets captured
Most relevant memory layers
Shared & Verifiable
Working memory captures private agent reasoning. Shared memory is where multi-party context coordinates. Verifiable memory is where decisions are enshrined.
Athlete-owned
Career data portable
Federation-aligned
Integrity-ready
Deployment & partners
European Gymnastics · Athletic federations
Real enterprise data, processed in production, with decision traces enshrined as Knowledge Assets in the OriginTrail DKG.
The problem
The case for verifiable decisions in sport.
An athlete career generates performance data, medical records, eligibility rulings, and anti doping history, held by clubs, federations, and service providers that change over time. The athlete rarely controls any of it, and when they move, the record does not reliably move with them.
Governing bodies face the mirror image of the problem. Eligibility and sanction decisions must be defensible years later, often before an arbitration panel, and the evidence sits across organizations with different systems and different retention practices.
How it works
How a decision becomes verifiable.
Context the federation, club, or medical team is entitled to see moves into shared memory, under the athlete’s control where the data is personal.
The ruling records its reasoning: criteria applied, exception granted, and the official who authorized it.
The trace is enshrined in the DKG so the decision can be verified later by an arbitration panel without depending on one organization’s archive.
What changes
What this changes in practice.
The change is that an athlete record becomes portable without becoming exposed. Clubs and federations verify that a clearance or eligibility ruling was properly made without receiving the underlying medical file, which is the balance that current data sharing arrangements rarely strike.
For governing bodies it reduces the cost of being challenged. Because the rule version, evidence, and authorizing official are fixed at the moment of a ruling, defending that ruling years later does not depend on whoever still remembers the case.
FAQ
Questions about sport.
Who owns the athlete data in this model?
Ownership stays with the athlete and the institutions that create records. nOS records verifiable decisions about that data; it does not centralize the data itself, and disclosure remains controlled.
Why does portability matter to a federation?
Because eligibility and medical decisions depend on history. When the record follows the athlete verifiably, a receiving club or federation inherits context instead of restarting assessments.
How does this help in a dispute?
Arbitration turns on what was known and which rule applied at the time. A decision trace fixes both at the moment of the ruling, rather than relying on a later reconstruction.
Is Trace Labs working with sports bodies?
European Gymnastics is named among the federations and athletic organizations in this area, with decision traces enshrined as Knowledge Assets in the OriginTrail DKG.
What about minors and sensitive medical data?
Sensitive records stay in the controlled environment of the organization holding them. What is shared is verification that a decision followed policy, with disclosure controlled by the athlete or guardian where the data is personal.
Can an athlete take their record when they transfer?
That is the intent of the model. Because decision history attaches to the athlete rather than to a single club database, a transfer carries verifiable context instead of restarting assessments.
Start free
Power up your business with the OriginTrail DKG.
Create Knowledge Assets, build shared context graphs, enshrine decision traces. Open-source infrastructure. Community support. Zero cost.
Go Pro
The full Network Operating System.
Custom agent frameworks (Hermes, OpenClaw, LangChain, Claude). Custom data pipelines. Custom integrations with your enterprise systems. Dedicated infrastructure and support.